LANDING ZONE 7.8.20
BY ALAN W DOWD
Even as America’s newest military branch focuses on defending U.S. interests and assets in space, the Army and
Marine Corps are literally lowering their sights and focusing on a
new/old domain that lies underground.
Going down
Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency raised more than a few eyebrows
recently when it issued a request for access to tunnel systems under
U.S. colleges and urban centers to assist the Pentagon in preparing U.S.
troops for subterranean combat and disaster response.
This is just the latest in a growing list of Pentagon efforts to prepare for underground warfare.
Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in February requested $14.4 million to build a dedicated tunnel-warfare facility, where
commando units will train “to defeat complex, hardened facility
targets.”
The Marine Corps has built simulated underground training facilities at Twentynine Palms, Calif., Marine Corps Timesreports.
In
2017-2018, the Army launched a $572 million effort focused on “training
and equipping 26 of its 31 active combat brigades to fight in
large-scale subterranean facilities,” as Military.com reports.
The program is preparing infantry units to “navigate, communicate,
breach heavy obstacles and attack enemy forces in underground mazes”
such as sewers, subways and structures expressly designed for military
use.
Why
are the Army, Marines, SOCOM and Pentagon brass suddenly concerned
about underground combat operations? The answer can be found on the
nightly news and in the morning headlines.
Earlier
this year, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials discovered what
they call the “longest ever” tunnel spanning the U.S.-Mexico border.
Used by Mexican drug traffickers, the tunnel began in Tijuana and
terminated in San Diego. It featured a railway, plumbing and
ventilation, according to The Washington Post, which adds that more than 200 tunnels have been discovered by CBP agents.
Iranian
soldiers were caught this spring building a tunnel in eastern Syria
large enough to store and hide sophisticated weapons systems. That
tunnel was targeted in airstrikes of unknown origin.
Last October, ISIS leader Bakr al-Baghdadi retreated into a tunnel as a U.S. assault team closed in on him.
In the past five years, Egypt has destroyed 3,000 tunnels in the Sinai. The tunnels were used to move terrorists, weapons, drugs and vehicles.
In 2018, the Israeli military conducted an operation targeting and sealing multiple tunnels constructed by Hezbollah terrorists under Israel’s northern border. To the south, Israel caught Hamas
militants using tunnels to breach Israel’s border defenses. One
tunnel-borne ambush killed 11 IDF troops in 2014. That year, the IDF
discovered at least 14 Hamas tunnels reaching into Israel.
Then
there is North Korea. In 1974, U.S. and ROK forces discovered a tunnel
on the south side of the DMZ. When they investigated, a booby-trapped
mine killed an American sailor and a Korean soldier.
“The
tunnel was over two miles long, a third of which was on the South
Korean side of the border, and had space enough for 2,000 soldiers to
traverse it per hour,” one report detailed. As the years ticked by, other tunnels were discovered south
of the DMZ. One was large enough to deploy 30,000 troops per hour into
South Korea. It is “estimated that that there are between 16 and 20 more
infiltration tunnels that have escaped detection.”
Almost
as worrisome are the tunnels North Korea has constructed to hide, hold
and transport weaponry, troops and commanders inside North Korea.
“Reports from North Korean defectors and satellite imagery indicate
Pyongyang has built thousands of tunnels into mountains and hillsides to
house artillery, ammunition and medical supplies,” VOA reports.
Some of the tunnels – which number around 5,000 – are believed to be
deep and wide enough to hide and/or move large formations of troops,
heavy artillery and WMDs.
Put
another way, if U.S.-ROK forces are ever ordered north of the 38th
Parallel – whether to conduct a humanitarian, decapitation or
counterproliferation operation – the odds are high they will have to go
underground at some point. It won’t be easy. Military planners warn that
there are numerous aspects of subterranean warfare that are unlike any
other theater: the pitch-black darkness, lack of oxygen, communications
breakdowns, all of which triggers disorientation.
Ancient weapon
The
bad news is that tunnel warfare is part of our military’s future. The
good news, if we can call it as such, is that tunnel warfare is part of
our military’s past, which means our troops and their commanders can
apply the lessons of history to tomorrow’s subterranean battles.
“Tunnels and caves,” writes Hudson Institute’s Arthur Herman, “have a long history in warfare stretching back to biblical times.”
In
April 1862, Union troops discovered “a network of underground shelters”
used by the Confederate army near Yorktown, as one Army historical
analysis notes.
In 1864, Union forces attempted to break through at Petersburg by
tunneling under Confederate lines and then detonating a massive amount
of gunpowder. As one historical account explains, the so-called Battle of the Crater saw a Union regiment from
the 48th Pennsylvania Infantry tunnel under the Confederate
fortifications. “The soldiers, experienced miners from Pennsylvania’s
anthracite coal regions, dug for nearly a month to construct a
horizontal shaft over 500 feet long” and filled with four tons of
gunpowder. The ensuing explosion destroyed a Confederate battery and
most of an infantry regiment. But Union forces were unable to take
advantage of their tunnel attack. In fact, many were left as sitting
ducks in a crater of their own making.
Herman
notes that World War I’s “trenches were essentially a static system of
tunnels that served as front lines for each side.” In an echo of the
Union’s tunnel attack at Petersburg, the British dug more than 20
tunnels under the German lines and filled them with 450 tons of TNT. The
British attack proved far more successful than the Union’s, as it
resulted in an explosion “so enormous that ... 10,000 German soldiers
were instantly killed,” according to Herman.
During
World War II, France’s Maginot Line consisted of “an elaborate
underground system of bunkers and supply depots supporting 22 large,
aboveground forts and 36 smaller forts, all connected by a railway,
pulled by diesel-powered locomotives, that passed through a network of
tunnels.” The German answer to the Maginot tunnels was simple and
ingenious: bypass them, cut them off and don’t fight inside them.
Of
course, sometimes that’s not an option, as U.S. forces discovered on
many of the atolls and islands occupied by Imperial Japan. U.S. troops
encountered tunnel defenses in Tarawa, Iwo Jima and Okinawa. In the
latter, a Japanese command post consisted of a web of tunnels 1,475 feet
long capable of holding 4,000 troops. Okinawa claimed 12,000 American
troops, 110,000 Japanese troops and 145,000 Okinawan civilians. “One of
the factors that contributed to these ghastly statistics was the extent
to which the killing took place underground,” the Japan Timesconcludes.
A report published by the Army’s Modern War Institute (MWI) adds that “Soldiers
and Marines battled entrenched and underground Chinese troops in Korea.”
And in Vietnam, “the 173rd Airborne Division encountered thousands of
tunnels stretching hundreds of miles from the outskirts of Saigon to the
Cambodian border.”
The
U.S. government got into the tunnel-building business, too. During the
Cold War, Washington built tunnels and other underground systems for
defense, command and control, and continuity of government operations at
places like Cheyenne Mountain, Mount Weather and the Greenbrier. Some
were declassified and shut down as the Cold War ended. Others, like
Cheyenne Mountain’s NORAD, are still in use. Still others are likely
operating but classified.
In
the early phases of the global war on terrorism, Special Operations
personnel, Marines and an Army biochem unit planned a 12-hour operation
to clear an al Qaeda hideout in eastern Afghanistan. Instead of a quick
mop-up operation, the assault force spent nine days dismantling and
destroying a labyrinthine system of 70 tunnels. Remarkably and
ironically, the tunnel network “was built with the help of U.S. money in
the mid-1980s by mujahedin forces fighting the Soviet occupation of
Afghanistan,” The Washington Post reported at the time.
In
both Iraq wars (1990-1991 and 2003-2011), the enemy used tunnels to
hide weaponry and/or conduct ambushes. “In Operation Desert Storm,” MWI
points out, “the Air Force deemed underground Iraqi bunkers the most
secure places in the country.” In Operation Iraqi Freedom, al-Qaida in
Iraq used a network of tunnels to store weapons, hide and conduct
attacks, as an Army report destroyed details.
If
tunnels can be used to deliver drugs into U.S. cities, they can be used
to deliver weapons. If terrorists are using tunnels to attack Israel
and Egypt, they can use tunnels to attack America. And if U.S. troops
were forced to fight underground in the 19th century and 20th century,
they will need to be prepared to do so in the 21st century.